A co-publishing deal typically splits the publishing rights between the songwriter and the co-publisher. The songwriter retains a portion of their copyright and receives a share of the royalties. However, the co-publisher also gets a share, which can affect the overall income and control the songwriter has over their work.

Yes, a co-publishing deal allows you to retain more control over your music compared to a full publishing deal. You share ownership and revenue with the publisher, but maintain a larger share of rights and decision-making power, giving you greater influence over how your music is used and monetized.

In a co-publishing music deal, the publisher handles administrative tasks, such as licensing, royalty collection, and copyright registration. They also promote the music, secure placements in media, and provide creative support. The songwriter retains a portion of the publishing rights, sharing both responsibilities and revenues with the publisher.

In a co-publishing music deal, royalties are typically split between the songwriter and the co-publisher. The songwriter usually retains 50% of the total royalties (the “writer’s share”), while the remaining 50% (the “publisher’s share”) is divided between the original publisher and the co-publisher, often equally.

In a co-publishing music deal, ownership is split between the songwriter and the publishing company, typically 50/50. This contrasts with traditional publishing deals where the publisher often retains a larger share, usually 100% of the publishing rights, while the songwriter keeps the writer’s share only.

In a co-publishing music deal, revenue is typically split between the songwriter and the co-publisher. The songwriter retains a portion of the publishing rights and royalties, while the co-publisher handles administrative tasks and promotion, earning a share of the income generated from licensing, performances, and other revenue streams.